Austrian economics without extreme apriorism - Construing the fundamental axiom of praxeology as analytic

Author(s)
Alexander Linsbichler
Abstract

Current debates between behavioural and orthodox economists indicate that the role and epistemological status of first principles is a particularly pressing problem in economics. As an alleged paragon of extreme apriorism, the methodology of Austrian economics in Mises’ tradition is often dismissed as untenable in the light of modern philosophy. In particular, the defence of the so-called fundamental axiom of praxeology—“Man acts.”—by means of pure intuition is almost unanimously rejected. However, in recently resurfacing debates, the extremeness of Mises’ epistemological position has been called into question. Rather than directly engaging in these exegetical discussions, this paper aims to substantiate the possibility and plausibility of conventionalist defences of praxeology per se. The proposed shift includes settling for an analytic fundamental axiom and acknowledging the prima facie tenability of other research programs than praxeology. Since conventionalist praxeology is only moderately aprioristic, mainstream economists and philosophers might be more likely to engage in fruitful discussions with those Austrian scholars who elaborate pragmatic arguments for praxeology instead of invoking pure intuition.

Organisation(s)
Department of Economics, Department of Philosophy, Department of History
Journal
Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science
Volume
198
Pages
3359–3390
No. of pages
32
ISSN
0039-7857
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02150-8
Publication date
03-2019
Peer reviewed
Yes
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
502021 Microeconomics, 603123 History of science, 603124 Theory of science, 603102 Epistemology
Keywords
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Social Sciences(all), Philosophy
Portal url
https://ucris.univie.ac.at/portal/en/publications/austrian-economics-without-extreme-apriorism--construing-the-fundamental-axiom-of-praxeology-as-analytic(2432e8ae-2b27-4385-85e5-d2944f086f43).html